THAT Agency Design Studio Blog

What’s the difference between search and social media? Increasingly, the answer is “very little.” There is no dividing line: Facebook has become more of a force in the search industry, particularly in local search and current events. But what have search engines done to venture into social territory?

One would look to the undisputed king of the search industry, Google, and expect an answer. But thus far, Google’s forays into social have been stymied. Lively, a network with a similar model of popular Second Life, failed. Buzz, which aimed to be Google’s Twitter, failed. And, have you have ever heard of Orkut? No? You’re not alone; it is virtually unknown in the US.

Bing has had some success – because they have partnered with social mecca, Facebook, to provide more personalized search results. But according to Rick Skrenta, CEO and co-founder of Blekko, neither search company has been as “aggressive” as the engine that “slashes the web.” What is Blekko doing to create a social scene of its own?

That’s just it: Blekko isn’t out to reinvent the wheel. Skrenta says, “It’s interesting that they’re [Google] trying to boot up their own social experience with +1 rather than tapping into one of the existing massive social systems that are already out there.”

This is what Blekko has done; they are incorporating Facebook likes and comments to give a more customized search for users. Another reason why Skrenta believes Blekko offers a superior experience is that the focus is on spam elimination. “If you take a random Facebook user, first of all, it’s likely to be a human, and second of all, if you can restrict it to the people that are in your social circle, since people don’t generally follow spammers, the signal is much higher.” And the results more relevant and legitimate.

Google hasn’t given up on social yet; they’re hoping that people like their +1 as much as they do the thumbs up icon from Facebook.

Share this article

Every search engine is on a quest to deliver the perfect search experience – or at least one that is better than the next guy. This is why Blekko developed the slash tag method of narrowing down results; why Microsoft made Bing the “Decision Engine,”; and why Google has unrolled a new blocking feature. The feature will allow you to hide certain sites from appearing in the SERPs to create more targeted and relevant results for you.

We have all searched for a topic only to get a handful (or more) of sites that were of low quality, had too many ads, didn’t display the content well, or for other reasons, wasn’t helpful. If you want to block these sites, you will see an option beside the “cached” feature, which reads “Block all example.com results.” When might this be useful? Say you are doing a research paper and need quality information. You keep getting results from a site like Associated Content (which can and does provide useful information, but not at an academic level), so you block them to make your searches cleaner and more efficient.

You will need to create or sign into a Google account in order to confirm a block, and next time you search, those results will be eliminated from your page. At the top, however, you will see “You blocked 1 result.” You have the option to see the blocked sites, and you can also manage them in a settings page.

How could this affect SEO? The consensus is that it won’t affect good SEO. In its announcement, Google said, “While we’re not currently using the domains people block as a signal in ranking, we’ll look at the data and see whether it would be useful as we continue to evaluate and improve our search results in the future….”

Quality content and SEO is more important than ever as searchers are gaining more control over their experience.

Share this article

When you consider that in 2007, Google brought in over 14 billion dollars from Adwords alone, it was only a matter of time until Microsoft invested big bucks and completely redesigned their flagship search engine. The result is Bing, and it has been getting a lot of attention lately.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share this article