THAT Agency Design Studio Blog

Despite rivalry and competition, the “big 3” search engines teamed up on a new initiative, called Schema.org, which will help web publishers to make content more easily understood by search engines, and it is hoped, better represented in the SERPs. Google fellow Ramanathan Guha says, “With Schema.org, site owners can enhance how their sites appear in search results not only on Google, but on Bing, Yahoo, and potentially other search engines as well in the future.” How does it work, and why did the rival search engines come together on this project?

The move to standardize common web tags should benefit everyone from web masters to consumers to the search engines themselves. Webmasters can take any number of routes when marking up pages, or labeling content. Using a common language will make it easy to publish information and achieve greater accuracy in results. Guha says, “We know that it takes time and effort for webmasters to add this markup to their pages, and including markup is much harder if every search engine asks for data in a different way.”

Bing, Yahoo, and Google will then be better able to crawl and index sites, which should, in turn, produce better results for users. Schema has more than 100 HTML tags for categories, including events, people, places, organizations, products, movies and books, and reviews. How might this be helpful? Say a search for “who” is conducted. By using the tags, the search engines are able to distinguish between sites that offer information on The Who, the World Health Organization, or the correct use of who vs. whom without having to guess.

Share this article

It is common practice and a well known fact among the major players (Google, Amazon, EBay) that to remain relevant and considered the competition, the user’s experience should be just that, an experience. By humanizing their services and becoming multifaceted interactive tools, they have secured top-spot in their respective communities. Yahoo! Search is on the heel of thirty fires, with rumors of 2,000 more. It is speculated that, at present, Yahoo! is a thirteenth of Google’s worth, with not much else going for them to cast an optimistic future.

Aaron Wall, author of SEO Book.com, offers ten suggestions to Yahoo!, and those in similar situations, on how they can achieve the relevancy needed to become a contender. Here are just a sample:

1.) “Increase the relevancy of their directory by actually featuring it (the directory looks like a sidebar to a blog that occupies most of dir.yahoo.com)”

The Yahoo! directory of present day looks and functions exactly like the Yahoo! directory I was using ten years ago.

“Become more selective with what sites they accept. You can appreciate their bad marketing of the Yahoo! Directory by the fact the Google Directory (a DMOZ clone) has a higher PageRank.”

2.) “Brand Yahoo! search as human edited safe search and find a way to pay end users for their contribution… Google gives Checkout advertisers free ads and a higher ad CTR (which leads to a lower ad cost).”

4.) “Let users comment on search results AND on listings in search results. Controversy surround this will lead to more people talking about and evaluating Yahoo! Search for quality.”

By creating a forum for the user to divulge his or her own experience and advice to future users, you can achieve that human interaction that is paramount to a service’s success. Case-and-point, Wikipedia.

9.) “Put the Yahoo! brand on the millions of syndicated domain landing pages they power each day.”

You don’t ever hear people saying, “I’m going to go yahoo that when I get home.” No, the catch phrase is “google it”. It rolls off the tongue. The Yahoo! marketing campaign needs to have a farther reach online and beyond those television ads with the guy yodeling, “Yahooooooo.”

Wall touches on six other points in 10 Things Yahoo! Search Must do to Become Relevant, all with the dominating theme of interaction; building Yahoo! into something that Google has seemingly perfected.

Share this article

So everything you read about Search Engine Optimization, otherwise refered to as SEO, is always about how to optimize for Google. Well, in this post, I am going to talk about how to optimize for the 2nd largest Search Engine, Yahoo.

Yahoo’s algorithm is based on that of Inktomi, which Yahoo purchased back in 2002 as a plan to stop serving Google results in their search queries.

To properly optimize for Yahoo, the following are the key Factors that you must focus on:

1. Keyword Density
2. Site Structure
3. Backlinks
4. Aging

Keyword Density
While there is no exact science or exact keyword density for a website page, you should try and keep your keyword density between 3% – 5%. Keyword densities change on a regular basis. By keeping within the targeted range, you ensure that your site will always be optimized to the fullest extent.

Site Structure
Site Structure is perhaps most important to the Yahoo Search Engine Crawler. Your Site Structure determines the order in which your content gets seen by the crawlers, which in turn will give certain content a higher priority than other content. Secondly, a properly structured site will allow the crawler to read necessary content and will hide the ugly, excessive coding using CSS.

Backlinks
Having a solid backlink count from relevant sources with good anchor text is a good practice across all search engines, but it is a major factor on Yahoo. For backlinks, Yahoo factors in quality of site, anchor text and whether the site is a recpricol link or not.

Aging
One of the main factors that is out of a website optimizers control is the age of a site. New sites and links are not given the same weight as sites and links that have been around for some time. New sites can find it to be extremely difficult to rank for competitive phrases within 6 months.

Optimizing for Google is NOT all that you need to do in order to have a fully optimized site. Google only reaches a certain number of users. By optimizing for other Search Engines, your site will have more visibility across multiple Search Engines.

Share this article